It wasn't the biggest
news story of the week. Not in column inches or headline-size.
It probably got less
space in some papers than the latest “wardrobe malfunction”
suffered by some female “celebrity” or other. If, indeed, those
papers mentioned it at all.
But all that shows is
what a twisted sense of news values we have.
Not just “we” as a
society of news-consumers, but “we” as a species.
And it's not only our
news values that are twisted, either.
Sometimes I think the
world is suffering from a pandemic. A ghastly, deadly disease from
which there is no escape and little hope of recovery.
It's spreading
uncontrolled across the entire globe. Leaving death and destruction
everywhere it goes – and everywhere it doesn't go (which is
precious few places).
And so far there is no
cure. Though some people are working on one.
Nuclear Armageddon,
anyone? It may have slipped down the list of public fears since the
early 1960s, but the danger is no less real now.
That’s not the
holocaust I’m really talking about, though.
This one isn’t a
scary possibility, it’s an on-going fact.
A tale every wildlife
documentary you’ve ever seen has hinted at but never told so
definitively before.
So what was that story?
In one paper that did
carry it – about four short paragraphs, down-page, near the back –
it bore the headline: “Half world's animals lost”.
Yes, you read that
right. Half of all the mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians and fish
in the world.
Actually slightly more
than half – 52 per cent – that's how much the global population
of all those creatures fell by in 40 years, from 1970 to 2010.
A lot more – a
horrifying 72pc – of freshwater creatures were lost, raising the
spectre of entirely lifeless rivers within our lifetimes.
By the end of which
elephants, sea turtles, polar bears, tigers and many other species
may be extinct.
And the reason for this
appalling, almost unimaginable, situation?
Over-fishing by humans.
Hunting by humans. Climate change, caused by humans.
Most devastating of
all, habitat loss – caused by humans.
As Professor Ken
Norris, director of science at London Zoo, put it: “This damage is
not inevitable, but a consequence of the way we choose to live.”
It’s partly that
we’ve spread and increased our own numbers too effectively. That
there are simply too many human beings competing for the space and
resources other creatures need too.
But it’s more our
rapacious habit of destroying everything in our path in the pursuit
of our own temporary convenience or personal gain.
The worldwide mania for
“growth”.
By which we mean mere
economic growth at the cost of things that actually grow.
Rainforests destroyed
to put more steak on our plates than is good for us.
Or for palm-oil to wash
our hair in and thicken our gravy.
Or for bio-fuels that
we pretend to believe are less damaging for the planet than burning
oil.
Sea-beds denuded to
satisfy our taste for scallops.
Depressingly – but
unsurprisingly – the WWF’s Living Planet Report found that the
loss of wildlife was worst in poor countries.
Not that the poor treat
wild things worse, but that those in richer states export their
excesses.
Corporations based in
the US, Europe and here commit atrocious acts in lands that lack the
economic clout to stop them.
Exploiting the forests,
the minerals, the wild things just as they exploit the people.
Away from the eyes of
those who buy their products or vote for the politicians their
“donations” support.
As Professor Norris
said: “The scale of biodiversity loss and damage to the very
ecosystems that are essential to our existence is alarming.
“We need to explain
to the public that what they do is directly behind the trends we are
seeing.
“There is an enormous
disconnect between going to the supermarket and putting fuel in your
car and the global statistics we’re talking about here.”
Indeed there is.
Whether a conscience-salving change in our shopping habits will be
enough to avoid global catastrophe is another matter.
The phrase “too
little too late” springs grimly to mind.
David Nussbaum of the
WWF is looking on the bright side, though – publicly, at least.
He said: “The scale
of destruction highlighted in this report should be a wake-up call to
us all.
“Next year, when
countries of the world come together to agree on a set of sustainable
development goals, presents us with a unique opportunity to reverse
the trends.
“We all –
politicians, businesses and people – have a responsibility to act
to ensure a healthy future for both people and nature.”
He’s right, of
course. But don’t hold your breath waiting for those businesses and
politicians to start doing the right thing.
If they do, they’ll
be going against the grain of countless generations.
I read somewhere a
little while ago that the Earth is currently experiencing its sixth
“major extinction episode”.
The last one was the
massive meteor strike 65 million years ago that did for the
dinosaurs.
A disaster on an almost
unimaginable scale. One that changed the course of life on earth by
wiping out most of it.
The present catastrophe
is us. And the scale and pace of change isn't that different.
1 comment:
We don't actually know that it was a meteor strike that did for the dinosaurs. It's a front-running theory, but there's no certainty about it at all. Chaotic systems like the biosphere can throw up events like major extinctions without any external triggers at all. For all we know it could have been a super-clever dinosaur rather like us - even though there are an awful lot of us, we've not been around very long. In 65 million years time there might be very few traces of us left; likewise those super-clever dinosaurs might have left no traces (that we've found yet, or managed to interpret).
Post a Comment